It seems like a big jump from gcse, from writing no essays to lots.
Just wondering any tips?
Key things to include?
How to get good marks?
As long as you know your case studies you'll be fine, that's the biggest difference from gcse. Just be prepared to talk about a few in a bit of depth, and drop any relevant facts/figures you've read (from news, etc.) in to back up your points. And if you can't quite remember a fact or statistic, don't be afraid to make a guess, as long as its not too implausible. They're not going to check every figure, and they won't penalise you if you're wrong. I just made a page for each main case study and some more general stuff, and learned as much of it as I could. Good luck, feel free to ask anything else about it
From assessment objectives..
AO1 Knowledge and understanding - it means you have to understand theories, and remember facts accurately from case studies; show the examiner that you UNDERSTAND what you're being asked and show that you've got the KNOWLEDGE. to show your knowledge it would be best to define key terms in your introductory paragraph, and then expand in detail in later paragraphs.
AO2 Application and analysis - apply the case studies to SUPPORT your points. for example, in the first sentence of each paragraph you state your point and then you use 'for example, in ...' (evidence) to support your point. analyse the evidence as well, that is, to look at the evidence at a wider or deeper dimension...APPLICATION is key - you can't get marks from just writing out all the facts from case studies. you MUST apply them to your answer.
AO3 Communication and structure - a good introduction is important, you should put definitions, outline what you're gonna look at in your essay and what case studies are you gonna use. intro is used to give a clear picture to the examiner of what are you gonna say. after writing a few paragraphs, CONCLUSION is extremely important. using previous paragraphs to clearly state your conclusion. don't just use one or two sentence. make it about 4 to 5 lines at least (depends on your handwriting..).
P.S. i'm still an A2 level geography student but hopefully it helps!
Global Warming, Ozone Hole and Other Ends of the World
Every day and every hour we hear about horrors that are menacing our peaceful lives: the looming catastrophes that are going to eliminate the whole civilization just in a couple of years’ time, death and destruction this or that human’s enterprise will bring if these vicious scientists or businessmen are not stopped. The reasons why we hear all of these threats are simple: a) people like to be afraid, b) people like to blame everyone except for themselves. Mass media know these tendencies very well and provides for them.
It is actually fascinating to observe if you have a little bit of memory and an attention span longer than that of a mussel: about ten-twenty years ago they scared us by the ozone hole that was rapidly growing above the Antarctica and exposed the Earth to deadly radioactive emission of the Sun with the end of the world due in a couple of decades. Time went past, world didn’t seem to end, some scientists suddenly discovered that the ozone hole over the Antarctica is growing and shrinking periodically and human activity doesn’t seem to affect it all that much, and… everybody suddenly forgot all about it. Media stopped to talk about it and people without constant reminding soon had it completely removed from their collective memory.
No problem, catastrophists say, there are plenty of other things people may be scared of. Let us welcome global warming. The idea that the global temperature on the planet is gradually growing due to the anthropogenic reasons is not new, but only during the last decades we saw a real upsurge of belief in it, ecological lobbies limiting the activity of industries and so on. And it seems to be working for now, even a recent Climategate scandal involving some of the most prominent statisticians promoting the theory (it showed that they were almost certainly falsifying the data of their research) doesn’t seem to turn the tide of public opinion. The same goes for many other Apocalypse theories, none of which came true in the end.
What is the most interesting question here is “cui prodest?”, i.e. who is to profit from it? Anyone may answer this question for himself, the only thing I consider to be obvious is that all these ends of the world are promoted way too much and turn out to be way too less than they are suspected.
In order to find out how to write informal essay – view our Informal essay section.
If you want to get better idea of what the peculiarities of writing in this subject field are, feel free to consult our Natural sciences section.